Was the reason everyone’s favorite 70s pinup girl looked relatively unsexy because she wasn’t a woman? Missing are natural curves and a bum could be good clues.
Yet another article telling us she WAS sexy. If, true, why isn’t it just self evident?
Source: Tranny Get Your Gun – 153News.net – Because Censorship Kills
I was a big fan of Brian Adams – back in the day.
Taylor Swift is still relevant, and watching it in contrast to a relatively short Brian Adams, assumed cis-man, makes it clear that it is not a woman, and, more likely, born a male.
The way it moves, the way it towers over Brian, the way it belts out a tune, makes it more a man in a drag, all the way to a carefully crafted EGI woman.
Any appearance of a celebrity in the media will presumably always be planned and pre-arranged. When it comes to Royalty they are followed by a whole team of journalists, dedicated news-magazines and all-around global press coverage of any significant event.
Kate Middleton is the current Duchess of Cambridge and married to Prince William who is destined to become king of the United Kingdom. Middleton has been discussed and analysed before* as she clearly does not appear fit to carry any child despite the large hands and her best efforts to put on weight.
•Catherine Elizabeth Middleton here pose in a purposefully staged shot heavily figuring her digit ratio as clearly female as it is altered to appear so
Childbirth would historically be a particularly important illusion* for the EGI. In order to effectively incarnate their inverted gender-role, the act of birth is clearly one of the most emblematic moments the Elite have to present to the public. And the bigger the lie, the harder it is for the public to fathom what they are presented.
Of course, once you have shed away the veil of magic the fact remains that the Elite still have to put up a performance for their public make-believe incarnation of the opposite sex to hold true. The fact there is nothing natural about the act of birth as portrayed by the EGI in public – they still make considerable efforts to play the act to perfection.
“Considering that Mia Farrow’s character in the movie is impregnated with Satan’s child by a coven of witches, the similarities are eerie and completely unsettling if you think about what it could possibly say about the newborn prince.”
– Lyndsey Matthews for Harper’s Bazaar
Sometimes fakery and fraud can be detected by the absence of natural human behaviour replaced by artificially over-produced scripts. In the case of Kate Middleton’s assumed fake child-birth, it seems the scriptwriters went to great lengths to find symbology in the dressing-code and thus thread far too heavy on the artificial nature of the commonly trivial occurrence of a newborn child.
Effectively, the scriptwriters behind the scenario for Kate Middleton’s magic act of producing a child she never was impregnated with seems to have their fingers stuck in the cinema cookie jar as they directly copied Mia Farrow’s dress from the occult masterpiece for some* : Rosemary’s Baby from 1968 (wiki)
•the very same dress worn by 50 years later well demonstrate the over-emphasis that can occur when you try too hard and there are no real facts to hang on to
*a fairly recent transvestigation by “Trans Investigator” – video here
*speculation on EGI childbirth magick in the forum – post here
*red dress coincidence theory from Harper’s Bazaar – article here